Are We Decentralized Yet?

Accounts On Decentralized Social Networks

🚨 Important Update: New Data Sources

On January 13, 2026, I switched data sources for the decentralized social networks. This means that old numbers from this site should not be compared to more recent ones.

Previously, Fediverse user numbers came from another site that was scraping Fediverse servers; now, I am running my own scraper. This gives me more flexibility to retain historical information and to deal with many of the quirks that individual Fediverse software has in reporting user numbers.

Atmosphere numbers used to come from the Bluesky relay; it's complicated, but what was getting reported was basically the number of users active since late 2023. Now, I'm listening to multiple relays and tracking account activity, allowing me to directly count monthly active users. This is more directly comparable to the way Fediverse users are counted.

Overall, these changes do not make huge differences to the indices, which is a good thing: it means these measures are fairly stable under a variety of assumptions.

What does this measure?

For the social networks, this site measures where user accounts are stored: in the Fediverse, these accounts are on servers (also known as instances); in the Atmosphere, they are on the PDSes that host users' data repos. All PDSes run by the company Bluesky Social PBC are aggregated in this dataset, since they are under the control of a single entity. Similarly, mastodon.social and mastodon.online are combined as they are run by the same company.

These indices are computed using Monthly Active Users. For the Fediverse, this data is reported by many (but not all) servers, and is scraped daily from servers that report it. We use nodes.fediverse.party for our server list. On the Atmosphere, we monitor all events on multiple relays, and keep track of the last time we saw each account take any action. This includes not only posting, but liking, following, blocking, and many other activities. We consider all accounts that have been active in the last month (30 days).

The Fediverse

Mastodon, Pixelfed, etc.
Shannon Index:
Details
One-Week Trend: (%)
Top decentralizers
HostChangeUsers
Servers
Biggest(%)
Rest(%)

The Atmosphere

Bluesky, Leaflet, etc.
Shannon Index:
Details
One-week Trend: (%)
Top decentralizers
HostChangeUsers
PDSes
Biggest(%)
Rest(%)

Hosting Services

What does this measure?

For web serving, this site uses data from a number of sources that have been aggregated by the Internet Yellow Pages project from the IIJ Research Laboratory. It uses the worldwide Tranco Top 1m list of the million most popular websites, compiled by the DistriNet research group. The URLs of these websites' front pages are mapped to IP addresses, which are then mapped to AS numbers. We use the sibling AS dataset from the Internet Intelligence Research Lab to aggregate ASes run by the same organization. The process is similar to that used by Habib et al. in SIGCOMM 2025, though we use a different data source and compute statistics worldwide. Note that because this style of measurement looks at the main URL for the site's front page, it will, in many cases, count the CDN serving a site rather than the site's origin server.

For the public git forges, this site uses the number of "origins" of type "git" archived by Software Heritage; this is roughly equivalent to the number of git repositories they crawl. Software Heritage's archive coverage can be found on their coverage page. This likely undercounts the true number of repositories, and each "fork" counts as a separate repository.

Web Serving

Cloudflare, AWS, etc.
Shannon Index:
Hosts
Biggest(%)
Rest(%)
Data: IYP ()

Public Git Forges

Github, Gitlab, etc.
Shannon Index:
Details
One-Week Trend: (%)
Top decentralizers
HostChangeRepos
Forges
Biggest(%)
Rest(%)

Email

What does this measure?

For email services, data comes from the paper Who's Got Your Mail?: Characterizing Mail Service Provider Usage by Liu et al., which appeared in the ACM Internet Measurement Conference in 2021. The authors use a variety of methods, including MX records, SMTP banner analysis, and TLS certificate analysis to uncover the provider serving mail for a particular domain. The statistics here come from examining the top 1 million domains on the Alexa list, and finding the email providers for those domains that consistently had MX records for a period of a few years.

Email Services

Gmail, Outlook, etc.
Shannon Index:
Services
Biggest(%)
Rest(%)
Data: Liu et al. ()

Network Infrastructure

What does this measure?

The measurements in this section come from the paper "Formalizing Dependence of Web Infrastructure" by Habib et al., which appeared in the ACM SIGCOMM conference in 2025. The authors of this work collected information for the most popular 10,000 websites in 150 countries using Google's CrUX dataset. These measurements were taken once in May 2023.

DNS server data is reported by the network (AS) hosting the authoritative nameservers for the domains in the set. Certificate authority (CA) data was collected by connecting to the front page of the webserver and finding the root CA of the certificate provided by the server.

DNS Hosting

Cloudflare DNS, Amazon Route 53, etc.
Shannon Index:
DNS Hosts
Biggest(%)
Rest(%)
Data: Habib et al. ()

TLS Certificates

Let's Encrypt, Digicert, etc.
Shannon Index:
CAs
Biggest(%)
Rest(%)
Data: Habib et al. ()

This page measures the concentration of user data on a variety of systems according to the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI) and the Shannon Index. User data is only one way to measure centralization: others include network structure, legal exposure, and concentration of social and technical power.

This site uses the purpose-built fetch-nodeinfo-bot to gather data about the Fediverse, and at-mau-watcher to gather data about the atmosphere.

Code and data are available on Codeberg. Comments and pull requests, including other metrics for measuring distribution and resiliency, are welcome!

By Rob Ricci: @ricci@discuss.systems / @ricci.io